The instinct is to count forward from today to the filing date and divide the work evenly. That produces a plan that fails, because the work is not evenly distributed and because some of it has a hard start date rather than a hard end date.
Work backwards instead. Your disclosure reports on a completed financial year. That year has to be collected as it happens. Therefore the binding constraint is not the filing date — it is the start of the reporting year, and everything that must be in place by then.
Two things must be in place by then and cannot be added later: activity data collection, and governance. Everything else — calculation, drafting, review — can be done afterwards, and is comparatively cheap.
If you read nothing else, read this. These are the items where starting late means paying multiples or misrepresenting the record.
Comfortably, if you start collecting now. Eighteen months gives you a full reporting year plus a run-up, which is the ideal position. The companies that struggle are not the ones with less time — they are the ones who spent the time planning rather than collecting.
Partially and expensively. Consultants can reconstruct what is reconstructible, and that will cost multiples of what collection would have. What money cannot buy is a generator log that was thrown away or a board minute that was never written.
Adoption timetables have shifted in several jurisdictions and it is possible. What does not move is the data: a company that has been collecting for two years is ready whenever it lands, and is equally protected against the date being brought forward.
A summary of a regulation is not the regulation. These are the primary documents this page is based on.
Four questions, and you get the year you first file, the framework, and what to collect first.
Plain-language explainers of the FRC and SEC rules, ISSB S1 & S2, and what each asks you to disclose.
What a consultant-led reporting cycle costs against an annual licence, in Naira.